<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interesting Article on Ruby vs PHP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://varunkrish.com/interesting-article-on-ruby-vs-php.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://varunkrish.com/interesting-article-on-ruby-vs-php.html</link>
	<description>Web Technologist Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:37:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sumanth krishna</title>
		<link>http://varunkrish.com/interesting-article-on-ruby-vs-php.html/comment-page-1#comment-10269</link>
		<dc:creator>sumanth krishna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varunkrish.com/interesting-article-on-ruby-vs-php.html#comment-10269</guid>
		<description>Hi Varun,
  I landed here, while I was commenting on this article (http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reasons_i_switched_back_to_p_1.html#comment-1866389).
I was happy going through the comments of the post, rather than his article(it was kind of joke).
Not only in this article, over all guys are tending to compare language(php) with frameworks(Rails).  
They fail to plan the approach and blame on languages.
No matter whether they recruit toppers or industry best... but the approach makes the project best/flop.

Any ways, I already commented there and I don&#039;t want people to get misguided, from your post.
&quot;Interesting comments on Article Ruby vs PHP&quot; would have been apt title.

Sumanth Krishna. A :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Varun,<br />
  I landed here, while I was commenting on this article (<a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reasons_i_switched_back_to_p_1.html#comment-1866389)" rel="nofollow">http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reasons_i_switched_back_to_p_1.html#comment-1866389)</a>.<br />
I was happy going through the comments of the post, rather than his article(it was kind of joke).<br />
Not only in this article, over all guys are tending to compare language(<acronym title="Hypertext PreProcessing">PHP</acronym>) with frameworks(Rails).<br />
They fail to plan the approach and blame on languages.<br />
No matter whether they recruit toppers or industry best&#8230; but the approach makes the project best/flop.</p>
<p>Any ways, I already commented there and I don&#8217;t want people to get misguided, from your post.<br />
&#8220;Interesting comments on Article Ruby vs <acronym title="Hypertext PreProcessing">PHP</acronym>&#8221; would have been apt title.</p>
<p>Sumanth Krishna. A <img src='http://varunkrish.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sumanth krishna</title>
		<link>http://varunkrish.com/interesting-article-on-ruby-vs-php.html/comment-page-1#comment-10268</link>
		<dc:creator>sumanth krishna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varunkrish.com/interesting-article-on-ruby-vs-php.html#comment-10268</guid>
		<description>Hi Varun,
  I landed here, while I was commenting on this article (http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reasons_i_switched_back_to_p_1.html#comment-1866389).
I was happy going through the comments of the post, rather than his article(it was kind of joke).
Not only in this article, over all guys are tending to compare language(php) with frameworks(Rails).  
They fail to plan the approach and blame on languages.
No matter whether they recruit toppers or industry best... but the approach makes the project best/flop.

Any ways, I already commented there and I don&#039;t want people to get misguided, from your post.
Sumanth Krishna. A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Varun,<br />
  I landed here, while I was commenting on this article (<a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reasons_i_switched_back_to_p_1.html#comment-1866389)" rel="nofollow">http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reasons_i_switched_back_to_p_1.html#comment-1866389)</a>.<br />
I was happy going through the comments of the post, rather than his article(it was kind of joke).<br />
Not only in this article, over all guys are tending to compare language(<acronym title="Hypertext PreProcessing">PHP</acronym>) with frameworks(Rails).<br />
They fail to plan the approach and blame on languages.<br />
No matter whether they recruit toppers or industry best&#8230; but the approach makes the project best/flop.</p>
<p>Any ways, I already commented there and I don&#8217;t want people to get misguided, from your post.<br />
Sumanth Krishna. A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
